La
Rosa, At Last by
Michael Filippidis
This
article was originally published in the Melbourne Super 8 Group
Newsletter, No. 69, May 1992.
If the recent
screening at the Glasshouse Function Room on March 10 of four
of Mark La Rosa's films proves anything it is that Mark La Rosa
is a true believer when it comes to the cinema. The screening
of March 10 illustrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that for La
Rosa the eternal subject of cinema is cinema itself. In La Rosa's
cinema classical narrative rubs shoulders with avant-garde experimentalism
and documentary with fiction. Such is the range of La Rosa's interests
that with only a few films to his name he is capable of producing
substantial contributions to each genre. In this respect he resembles
Godard the formalist as much as he does Godard the classicist
(if such an appellation is possible for Godard).
The first
film, Private Island, is a series of three, at most four,
images taken from Hitchcock's Psycho in which passages
of dialogue from the film are incorporated as a counterpoint to
the changing combination of images; the effect of this startlingly
alive with reverberations as the combination of frozen image and
dialogue produces a defamiliarization effect which makes us attend
to both La Rosa's experiment and to Hitchcock's original as though
we were encountering it anew. There is a paradox here, for insofar
as La Rosa's film, Private Island, is a new film never
before encountered, its images and sounds are not. Both the sounds
and images of La Rosa's images of La Rosa's experimental film
are so well known, so classic, that there is a sense in which
Private Island exists at two levels: a) as a completely
new film work never seen before, b) as a classic of Hollywood
cinema. The result, as I have said, is to produce a new encounter
with Psycho but one which I would stress is not a disinterested
one for it is imbued with La Rosa's own approach to Psycho.
The title Private Island is derived from a moment of dialogue
between Janet Leigh and Anthony Perkins in which Leigh philosophizes
about the universal need for a place of one's own: "a private
island" to which one may escape. The choice of dialogue as
well as juxtaposition of images is thus determined by a theme:
the notion of a private island as a haven or hell. In all of this
the film remains playful in its choice of combinations making
for some amusing moments which reverberate with formalist significance
as they illustrate the power of sound over sight.
|
|
|
Bridget
Among the Ten Thousand Things
|
It is this
fascination with sound which one could say characterizes the films
at the March 10 screening. This is perhaps most easily seen in
Bridget Among the Ten Thousand Things where an excruciatingly
slow pace yields an answer to a mystery: namely, the source of
the sound we hear throughout most of the film's black visuals.
These black visual images and mystery sounds are interrupted at
ever decreasing intervals of time by shots of backyard scenes
which are accompanied by a portentous sounding voice singing what
sounds like a religious piece; this portentous accompaniment is
subverted at the end when it turns out that the song breaks out
into a jovial celebratory mode at precisely the moment when all
is revealed to us. A formalist joke but a good one nonetheless,
BATTT is an exquisitely judged work, which is why the first
few minutes are so bewilderingly slow, painful even, as the narrative
(or what narrative there is) needs all that time of frustrated
curiosity to build up the mystery and, as it turns, the joke.
Small
Blue Thing was, by La Rosa's own admission, the least satisfying
work on the programme. As an attempt to document the sixteenth
birthday of a girl in the suburbs it suffers from what La Rosa
himself has rightly called an unfocused quality due largely to
the film's inability to enter the world of its subject at a deeper
level than it does. Originally, La Rosa had hoped that the girl
involved in the project, and who also appears in La Rosa's Working
Week, would contribute more to the script and thus establish
a closer rapport with the audience. Without this personal rapport
between the subject and the audience Small Blue Thing becomes
a film in which popular music and fashion images are juxtaposed
with scenes of the girl shopping for a party outfit; the theme
of the film has become the tyranny of images over our notions
of ourself as well as on our expectations. All of this is very
admirable though hardly original but the point to be remembered
here is that La Rosa is a filmmaker who, like Godard before him,
reminds us of the need to break free from the tyranny of the image.
This is a theme which all four films deal with explicitly, as
in the Bonnie and Clyde image which haunts Working Week
or implicitly by way of a formalist exercise in visual and sound
juxtaposition such as in Private Island and Bridget
Among the Ten Thousand Things.
Next comes
Working Week, La Rosa's Breathless only now set
in Broadmeadows with a touch of Bonnie and Clyde go to
Bourke Street thrown in. As a sidenote one recalls that it was
Godard and not Penn who was originally going to direct Bonnie
and Clyde when the film was still on the drawing board. All
of these postclassical Hollywood allusions are not to suggest
that Working Week is a newer than New Wave film,
at least, no more than the restrictions of Super-8 non-professional
filmmaking require it to be. What it is though, is La Rosa's first
attempt at a sustained narrative. Working Week takes as
its starting point Bonnie and Clyde but it manages to avoid
the trap of slavishly following the model by having a quiet ending
as opposed to the big bang-up ending of the original Bonnie
and Clyde. In La Rosa's film the act of betrayal happens so
easily and so quietly that for a viewer trying to predict the
ending of the film and who remembers the Penn original it may
seem that the film takes a potentially anticlimactic turn. Not
so! For the film, after all, is about Broadmeadows teenagers and
not the Barrow gang: this being the case one cannot help but comment
that two out of the four films screened were about adolescents
- a reflection on La Rosa's own sympathy for adolescents - and
that in each case he bestows upon his teenage protagonists the
dignity that their desires and desperation demand. In any case,
Working Week bears the stamp of a filmmaker who is not
a moralist as such but an observer of life's little victories
and defeats.
The use of
colour in scenes where the boy and girl are in shops is perhaps
a bit too obvious but in a film which examines the relationship
between images and expectations such a move is legitimate when
one considers the role of black and white in Bonnie and Clyde;
in that film it is the frozen images of the Barrow Gang which
are in monochrome and which present for posterity a hyper-criminal
pose which the rest of the film shows to be far from the truth.
A particularly effective sequence in Working Week is the
one in which the girl waits while the boy walks into a store to
steal a portable TV; the use of music as a complement to the tension
of the scene is outstanding. In all, Working Week is an
achievement not to be ignored and certainly not to be dismissed.
One looks forward with eagerness to La Rosa's next film.
©
Michael Filippidis, May 1992.
Back
to Mark La Rosa profile
|