CRITICAL
OVERVIEW:
As a film-maker, I tend to think of myself as a collaborator, an improvisor, and a listener, and these are the things that tend to drive the work I make. In New Zealand’s very conservative and technologically-based film culture, makers tend to be focused on a narrow understanding of an industrial cinema style, so it was both very easy and very difficult to work against that. When I started making film I was much more aligned with New Zealand’s lively experimental music and sound scene of the 1980s and 1990s, and it seemed to me that many of the characteristics of that scene made a lot of sense for film-making: small-scale, relatively domestic or home-made work based upon collaboration, a critical sense of ontology, a laterality of perfectionism, and the idea that if the received process of making something didn’t work, the best approach was to find your own way of doing it.
Funding was a problem for experimental cinema – of course this is true everywhere – so an important part of the methodology of making films that we developed was to make a cinema of the possible. There seemed no point in trying to aim to make films that couldn’t ever happen, and so I wanted to make films that could be made, and that were the kind of films I wanted to see about the world I lived in. I didn’t necessarily have an interest in big crews, lengthy scriptwriting processes, interacting with the industrial apparatus. Cinema seemed – and seems – to me to be most interesting when it’s about the recording of time and space by sound and vision, and these are the kinds of films I’m interested in making.
I’m also easily compelled to make films about relative intimacies and more private worlds, relationships, solitary spaces, looking, walking, waiting films. This came somewhat out of necessity, but it also seems something that cinema can do very well, and that requires tools that I feel I understand: a minimal apparatus, a collaborative and patient approach, a preparedness to listen and change from what comes out of improvisation, and an idea of what parts of the process require rigour.
Campbell Walker, May 2021.
|
|
Uncomfortable Comfortable (1999, 91 mins)
|
Why Can’t I Stop This Uncontrollable Dancing (2003, 110
mins)
|
FILMOGRAPHY:
Three Nights (1998, 19 mins, video, drama)
Uncomfortable Comfortable (1999, 91 mins, video, drama)
Why Can’t I Stop This Uncontrollable Dancing (2003, 110 mins, video, drama)
Little Bits of Light (2005, 119 mins, video, drama)
West Coast Beach (2005, 10 mins, video, short drama)
Remain The Same (2006, 20 mins, video, experimental)
W Lead (2007, 8 mins, video, experimental)
Broken Black Lines (2007, 65 mins, video, drama)
water is meaningless without ships (2011, 22 mins, video/sound work, experimental essay co-directed with Sally-Ann McIntyre)
Precariat Trees (2015, duration various, video/performance/installation)
a less formal border, which may only appear within the search for it / An arc is just a line you can bend (2020, duration various, video/performance/installation, collaboration with Sally-Ann McIntyre)
Here at the End (in production, 70(?) mins, video, drama)
|
|
Little Bits of Light (2005, 119 mins)
|
West Coast Beach (2005, 10 mins)
|
|
|
Remain the Same (2006, 20 mins)
|
water is meaningless without ships (2011, 22
mins)
|
©
Campbell Walker, May 2021.
Artist Blog
Contact Campbell Walker
Back
to Melbourne independent filmmakers index page
|